Please retest on current drm-intel-nightly.

This is no test "sprite-rotation" so I launched all of them. There is no Pass:
igt@kms_rotation_crc@bad-pixel-format  Fail 		
igt@kms_rotation_crc@bad-tiling  Fail 		
igt@kms_rotation_crc@cursor-rotation-180  Fail 		
igt@kms_rotation_crc@primary-rotation-180  Fail 		
igt@kms_rotation_crc@primary-rotation-270  Fail 		
igt@kms_rotation_crc@primary-rotation-90  Fail 		
igt@kms_rotation_crc@sprite-rotation-180  Not run 		
igt@kms_rotation_crc@sprite-rotation-270  Not run 		
igt@kms_rotation_crc@sprite-rotation-90  Fail 		
igt@kms_rotation_crc@sprite-rotation-90-pos-100-0  Fail

Hardware:
Platform: SKY LAKE Y A0 
CPU : Intel(R) Core(TM) m5-6Y57 CPU @ 1.10GHz (family: 6, model: 78  stepping: 3)
MCP : SKL-Y  D1 2+2 (ou ULX-D1)
QDF : QJK9 
CPU : SKL D0
Chipset PCH: Sunrise Point LP C1       
CRB : SKY LAKE Y LPDDR3 RVP3 CRB FAB2
Reworks : All Mandatories + FBS02,FBS03, F23, O-02 & O-06
Software
Linux : Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 64 bits
BIOS : SKLSE2R1.R00.X097.B02.1509020030
ME FW : 11.0.0.1173
Ksc (EC FW): 1.19

kernel 4.3.0-rc3-drm-intel-nightly+ (eb69e51) from git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel
Mesa - 11.0.2 from http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/
xf86-video-intel - 2.99.917 from http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/
Libdrm - 2.4.64 from http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/
Libva - 1.6.1 from http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libva/
vaapi intel-driver - 1.6.1 from http://cgit.freedesktop.org/vaapi/intel-driver
Cairo - 1.14.2 from http://cgit.freedesktop.org/cairo
Xorg Xserver - 1.17.2 from http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver

@jani, christophe

this bug can't be reproduced because the test no longer exists as it was reported (bug report is from more than a year ago).

The commit that changed the test is this one:

commit e1ce5eac338f44deda488a44db04faceea12f13a
Author: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Apr 22 16:44:05 2015 +0530

    kms_rotation_crc: Adding test for 90/270 rotation
    
    Adding 90/270 rotation testcase for primary and sprite planes.
    
    v2: Added position test for sprite. Checking for gen > 9 for 90/270.
    Some cleanup and rebase.
    v3: Added test for unsupported tiling and unsupported pixel format for 90/270
    v4: Added the legacy commit to initiate modeset in the negative test(Tvrtko)
    
    Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
    Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood <thomas.wood@intel.com>

However, running the newer tests (sprite-rotation-180, sprite-rotation-270, sprite-rotation-90, sprite-rotation-90-pos-100-0) they all get reported as failures but for a different reason.

We need to close this bug as not invalid and then open new bugs for each of the new test cases that are now failing.

How should we proceed?

Carlos

(In reply to Carlos Santa from comment #3)
> @jani, christophe
> 
> this bug can't be reproduced because the test no longer exists as it was
> reported (bug report is from more than a year ago).
> 
> The commit that changed the test is this one:
> 
> commit e1ce5eac338f44deda488a44db04faceea12f13a
> Author: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
> Date:   Wed Apr 22 16:44:05 2015 +0530
> 
>     kms_rotation_crc: Adding test for 90/270 rotation
>     
>     Adding 90/270 rotation testcase for primary and sprite planes.
>     
>     v2: Added position test for sprite. Checking for gen > 9 for 90/270.
>     Some cleanup and rebase.
>     v3: Added test for unsupported tiling and unsupported pixel format for
> 90/270
>     v4: Added the legacy commit to initiate modeset in the negative
> test(Tvrtko)
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
>     Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood <thomas.wood@intel.com>
> 
> However, running the newer tests (sprite-rotation-180, sprite-rotation-270,
> sprite-rotation-90, sprite-rotation-90-pos-100-0) they all get reported as
> failures but for a different reason.
> 
> We need to close this bug as not invalid and then open new bugs for each of
> the new test cases that are now failing.
> 
> How should we proceed?
> 
> Carlos

Sorry, above, I meant to say this should be close as invalid...

(In reply to Carlos Santa from comment #4)
> (In reply to Carlos Santa from comment #3)
> > @jani, christophe
> > 
> > this bug can't be reproduced because the test no longer exists as it was
> > reported (bug report is from more than a year ago).
> > 
> > The commit that changed the test is this one:
> > 
> > commit e1ce5eac338f44deda488a44db04faceea12f13a
> > Author: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
> > Date:   Wed Apr 22 16:44:05 2015 +0530
> > 
> >     kms_rotation_crc: Adding test for 90/270 rotation
> >     
> >     Adding 90/270 rotation testcase for primary and sprite planes.
> >     
> >     v2: Added position test for sprite. Checking for gen > 9 for 90/270.
> >     Some cleanup and rebase.
> >     v3: Added test for unsupported tiling and unsupported pixel format for
> > 90/270
> >     v4: Added the legacy commit to initiate modeset in the negative
> > test(Tvrtko)
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
> >     Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> >     Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood <thomas.wood@intel.com>
> > 
> > However, running the newer tests (sprite-rotation-180, sprite-rotation-270,
> > sprite-rotation-90, sprite-rotation-90-pos-100-0) they all get reported as
> > failures but for a different reason.
> > 
> > We need to close this bug as not invalid and then open new bugs for each of
> > the new test cases that are now failing.
> > 
> > How should we proceed?
> > 
> > Carlos
> 
> Sorry, above, I meant to say this should be close as invalid...

Agree, closing as invalid

Christophe, please open new bug for current test cases that are failling