Created attachment 63556 [details] build log From our downstream bug report: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356699 Attached is a fresh build log showing the error. I note that the following also appears in dmesg: lt-test-dbus-gl[10571] trap int3 ip:28f2d5e3561 sp:3f00534f7b0 error:0
The error is: ** (process:10571): ERROR **: Failed to invoke UnsafeDisableLegacyPropertyAccess (org.freedesktop.DBus.GLib.ErrorError): Method invoked for UnsafeDisableLegacyPropertyAccess returned FALSE but did not set error The offending function: > void > my_object_unsafe_disable_legacy_property_access (MyObject *obj) > { > dbus_glib_global_set_disable_legacy_property_access (); > } has the wrong signature. It should return gboolean, and have a GError** as a second parameter. The generated code expects it to return boolean: { (GCallback) my_object_unsafe_disable_legacy_property_access, dbus_glib_marshal_my_object_BOOLEAN__POINTER, 2486 }, The fact that the compiler cannot detect this is one of the many design flaws in dbus-glib.
Created attachment 63561 [details] [review] my_object_unsafe_disable_legacy_property_access: have the right signature I'm amazed this ever worked. Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51511 Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@collabora.co.uk> --- This is a bug in the regression test, rather than in dbus-glib itself, but it's a symptom of dbus-glib's design flaws. Have I ever mentioned how much better-designed GDBus is?
Comment on attachment 63561 [details] [review] my_object_unsafe_disable_legacy_property_access: have the right signature Review of attachment 63561 [details] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Looks correct, thanks!
Fixed in git for 0.102.
Working well now, thank-you for the quick response!
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.