Bug 23243 - please add disable caps-lock option.
Summary: please add disable caps-lock option.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: xkeyboard-config
Classification: Unclassified
Component: General (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: xkb
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: NEEDINFO
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-08-10 15:59 UTC by Han Boetes
Modified: 2009-08-14 14:46 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments

Description Han Boetes 2009-08-10 15:59:49 UTC
For all the options provided by xkeyboard-config concerning the caps-lock key there is still one missing. One very obvious and useful option. One that will make all mankind happy: Disable caps-lock.

YES YES YES YES!!!!!

No don't tell me to xmodmap -e 'remove Lock = Caps_Lock', this only works with regular keyboards. Not with bluetooth keyboards which reinitialize after not having been used for a few minutes. Besides it's a hack. There should be proper function for it in xkeyboard-config so end users can apply it without having to meddle in the console.

*surpresses urge to write message in full caps*
Comment 1 Sergey V. Udaltsov 2009-08-11 01:53:35 UTC
Let's calm down a bit...

Why are the options to make Caps ESC/Super/Backspace not enough for you?
Comment 2 Han Boetes 2009-08-11 11:37:48 UTC
Ha! I was ranting in gest! Not too seriously. But my plight is serious, deadly serious. </booming voice>

Because I often hit the key by accident while typing the 'a.' And seeing the number of hits on disabling the key all together on any other OS as wel as X using OSes I think it's time for a feature request. Giving the key any other function doesn't help the problem, since it will not result in caps keys, but in other unwanted behaviour.
Comment 3 Sergey V. Udaltsov 2009-08-11 14:38:24 UTC
> Because I often hit the key by accident while typing the 'a.' And seeing the
> function doesn't help the problem, since it will not result in caps keys, but
> in other unwanted behaviour.
What's wrong with the 'Super' mapping? That keysym itself is usually not bound to any function.
Comment 4 Han Boetes 2009-08-12 02:55:18 UTC
1) It's unusual and weird. People will not look for that solution, they will simply look for the button to disable the capslock.

2) The next key-press will get lost.
Comment 5 Sergey V. Udaltsov 2009-08-12 03:07:02 UTC
> 1) It's unusual and weird. People will not look for that solution, they will
> simply look for the button to disable the capslock.
Well, that's some kind of "workaround", I'd say

> 2) The next key-press will get lost.
Why??? If you unpress Caps first - nothing happens.

Anyway, I will think of that option.
Comment 6 Han Boetes 2009-08-12 03:20:50 UTC
> > 1) It's unusual and weird. People will not look for that solution, they will
> > simply look for the button to disable the capslock.
> Well, that's some kind of "workaround", I'd say

A work around... Please get real and look at the results of google for "caps-lock" or some variation to that. What have you found? A neutral article on wikipedia explaining the function of the key, and tons of sites CURSING that key! 
 
> > 2) The next key-press will get lost.
> Why??? If you unpress Caps first - nothing happens.

That's only a realistic solution to one finger typists.

> Anyway, I will think of that option.

Uhuh.

Comment 7 Sergey V. Udaltsov 2009-08-12 06:14:28 UTC
google results are impressive, I must admit.
Comment 8 Sergey V. Udaltsov 2009-08-14 14:11:48 UTC
caps:none added. you won;)
Comment 9 Han Boetes 2009-08-14 14:46:50 UTC
Much appreciated!


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.