Bug 109926 - dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.loops.short_circuit.do_while_fragment fails
Summary: dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.loops.short_circuit.do_while_fragment fails
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Mesa
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Drivers/Gallium/Iris (show other bugs)
Version: git
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Timothy Arceri
QA Contact: Intel 3D Bugs Mailing List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: bisected, regression
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-03-07 16:42 UTC by Mark Janes
Modified: 2019-06-06 16:36 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments

Description Mark Janes 2019-03-07 16:42:42 UTC
This test regressed with:

ecceb076e5c99cea94b853a9600947fe78b3ca74
Author:     Timothy Arceri <tarceri@itsqueeze.com>

st/glsl: start spilling out common st glsl conversion code

The NIR and TGSI paths are currently intertwined which makes it
not only hard to follow but also makes it hard to take advantage
of the differences in IR.

Here we take the first step to splitting that path apart. With
this we take the opportunity to no longer call the GLSL IR
optimisation passes after the final lowering calls for NIR. We
can instead just use the NIR passes which can produce better code
and should also result in faster compile times.

The speed-up can be measured in some dolphin uber shaders due to
no longer calling lower_if_to_cond_assign() for example
dolphin/ubershaders/120.shader_test goes from ~1.63 -> ~1.53
seconds on my machine.

There are some code changes as a result of not calling
lower_if_to_cond_assign(), this is because it flattens ifs that
contain UBOs where as NIR's peephole select doesn't. This is
were most of the regressions in Max Waves happens with shader-db.

shader-db results (VEGA):

Totals from affected shaders:
SGPRS: 2349056 -> 2349640 (0.02 %)
VGPRS: 1322160 -> 1323300 (0.09 %)
Spilled SGPRs: 21190 -> 21527 (1.59 %)
Spilled VGPRs: 99 -> 99 (0.00 %)
Private memory VGPRs: 0 -> 0 (0.00 %)
Scratch size: 72 -> 72 (0.00 %) dwords per thread
Code Size: 57260904 -> 57270932 (0.02 %) bytes
Compile Time: 1107186 -> 1022942 (-7.61 %) milliseconds
LDS: 786 -> 786 (0.00 %) blocks
Max Waves: 391932 -> 391619 (-0.08 %)
Wait states: 0 -> 0 (0.00 %)

Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>

--------------------------------------------------------------

./deqp-gles3 -n dEQP-GLES3.functional.shaders.loops.short_circuit.do_while_fragment

Test Output:

INCORRECT RESULT for sub-case 1 of 2):
Failing shader input/output values:
    input bool in0: false

    expected int sideEffectCounter: 0
Comment 1 Tapani Pälli 2019-06-06 08:29:00 UTC
This seems to pass fine for me now (maybe got fixed?), tested with Iris on KBL and Mesa @ b9d3a6b6565.
Comment 2 Mark Janes 2019-06-06 16:36:17 UTC
fixed by:

ad8c145658e1f3d84874393763ba7410d8a648e1
Author:     Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
nir/algebraic: Add some logical OR and AND patterns

The new OR pattern has been seen in the wild and can end up being
generated by GLSLang.  Not sure about the other two new patterns but we
may as well throw them in for completeness.  While we're here, we can
drop the '@bool' specifier from the one pattern because specifying True
already implies 1-bit which basically implies boolean.

Shader-db results on Kaby Lake:

    total instructions in shared programs: 15321227 -> 15321129 (<.01%)
    instructions in affected programs: 3594 -> 3496 (-2.73%)
    helped: 6
    HURT: 0

    total cycles in shared programs: 357481321 -> 357479725 (<.01%)
    cycles in affected programs: 44109 -> 42513 (-3.62%)
    helped: 6
    HURT: 0

VkPipeline-DB results on Kaby Lake:

    total instructions in shared programs: 3770504 -> 3769734 (-0.02%)
    instructions in affected programs: 19058 -> 18288 (-4.04%)
    helped: 163
    HURT: 0

    total cycles in shared programs: 1417583701 -> 1417569727 (<.01%)
    cycles in affected programs: 750958 -> 736984 (-1.86%)
    helped: 158
    HURT: 1

Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri <tarceri@itsqueeze.com>


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.