Summary: | Swfdec should support AVM2 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | swfdec | Reporter: | Tom Parker <freedesktop> |
Component: | library | Assignee: | swfdec ml <swfdec> |
Status: | ASSIGNED --- | QA Contact: | swfdec ml <swfdec> |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | high | CC: | bpepple, braden, bugzilla-freedesktop, daf, eddy.petrisor, eric225125, gaming4jc2, guillaume.desmottes, ihok, maxim_m, naveed, otte, patrys, reinouts, sdimitrovski, suikun, wildfire |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Mac OS X (All) | ||
URL: | http://blog.pixelbreaker.com/upload/polarclock/polarclock.html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | ALL | i915 features: | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 17220 | ||
Attachments: | new |
Description
Tom Parker
2007-05-02 10:46:33 UTC
Paint style errors are normally a problem further above in the shape parsing code. In this case I'd guess it's the regression I fixed in e58f25683ddec3dd4e613d7a7b4d5ab58a27561c - I found it directly after the 0.4.4 release. ;( However there's still enough script actions that aren't implemented, so it still doesn't work. Attaching the direct link to the flash file : http://blog.pixelbreaker.com/wp-content/flash/polarclock3/PolarClock3.swf With current git (post-0.5.3 ), it gives this on the console : SWFDEC: ERROR: swfdec_url.c(89): swfdec_url_new: URL /home/leroutier/Bureau/Flash tests/PolarClock3.swf has no protocol SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 86 unknown SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 82 AVM2Action SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 73 DefineFontAlignZones SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 88 unknown SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 74 CSMTextSettings SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 73 DefineFontAlignZones SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 88 unknown SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 74 CSMTextSettings SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 73 DefineFontAlignZones SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 88 unknown SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 74 CSMTextSettings SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 73 DefineFontAlignZones SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 88 unknown SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 74 CSMTextSettings SWFDEC: WARN : swfdec_swf_decoder.c(341): swfdec_swf_decoder_parse: tag function not implemented for 76 AVM2Decl Still nothing displayed because of unimplemented methods Uh oh. AVM2 tags are the new scripts added in Flash 9. So until we add support for Tamarin (or a custom interpreter for Tamarin scripts) this will not work. *** Bug 13049 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 14339 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 14516 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 15486 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 15496 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 15623 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 15990 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 16088 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 16533 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 16628 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 16743 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 15950 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 18083 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 18223 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 16869 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 18235 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 19499 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 22799 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 28773 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Oi, this bug has been going on for a long time. Shouldn't the priority be a little higher than low? I was thinking at least medium since it's affecting so many flash related applications. Also, has there been in any progress? It looks like a coders nightmare... lol :P given that swfdec is unmaintained, how about just dropping declaring bugs in it to be invalid? On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:28 PM, <bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org> wrote: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10840 > > --- Comment #23 from Luke <gaming4jc2@yahoo.com> 2010-06-27 13:28:56 PDT --- > Oi, this bug has been going on for a long time. Shouldn't the priority be a > little higher than low? I was thinking at least medium since it's affecting so > many flash related applications. Also, has there been in any progress? It looks > like a coders nightmare... lol :P > > -- > Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug. > > I certainly hope they don't kill the swfdec project entirely. I always thought it pwned gnash hands down. It also comes pre-built with a type of flashblock which was sweet. DON'T GIVE UP! ty. :)
Comment 26
chris.comes@icloud.com (Spammer; Account disabled)
2014-12-20 18:07:01 UTC
Comment hidden (spam)
Created attachment 111084 [details]
new
|
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.