Bug 68304 - UI: Number of slides per row resets in the viewer
Summary: UI: Number of slides per row resets in the viewer
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Impress (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
4.1.0.4 release
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard: target 4.3.0 target:4.2.3 target:4.1.6
Keywords: regression
: 68517 69373 71679 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-08-20 06:45 UTC by Juanjo
Modified: 2014-03-25 14:55 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Juanjo 2013-08-20 06:45:06 UTC
Problem description: 
The problema arises when I watch my slides in the many-slide viewer and switch back to the normal view (In Spanish they are Clasificador de diapositivas and Normal views, but I do not have the english version around to check) Normally I try to set the number of slides per row to 6 but when I switch to Normal and then back to the slides viewer, the number of slides is reset to 5 systematically

Steps to reproduce:
1. Switch to the many-slides viewer and increase the # of slides per row to 6
2. Switch to normal view.
3. Switch back to the many-slides: the number of slides per row is again 5.

Current behavior:
The number of slides per row is reset.

Expected behavior:
The desired number of slides per row should be respected.
              
Operating System: Windows 8
Version: 4.1.0.4 release
Comment 1 ign_christian 2013-08-25 02:28:12 UTC
*** Bug 68517 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 ign_christian 2013-08-25 02:30:25 UTC
Set Platform : All -> Bug 68517 occur in Linux Mint

Not reproducible on LO 4.0.5.1 (Win7 32bit)
Comment 3 tommy27 2013-08-28 18:33:57 UTC
issue confirmed (--> status NEW) on 4.1.0.4 under Win7 64bit.

no issue on 4.0.4.2 so it's clearly a regression.

added Impress expert to CC list.
Comment 4 Mark van Rossum 2013-09-15 11:09:46 UTC
*** Bug 69373 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 tommy27 2013-11-16 20:19:01 UTC
*** Bug 71679 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***