Summary: | input various spaces (latin keyboard) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | xkeyboard-config | Reporter: | Helge Hielscher <hhielscher> |
Component: | General | Assignee: | xkb |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | enhancement | ||
Priority: | high | CC: | nicolas.mailhot |
Version: | unspecified | Keywords: | NEEDINFO |
Hardware: | x86 (IA32) | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
Helge Hielscher
2006-12-29 13:13:04 UTC
I am not excited about the idea of changing the base layout used by virtually anyone... BTW, it is also included by layouts which do not have 3rd and 4th shift levels at all. I will think of it... IMHO such a definition would make it awfully easy to mistype things Also this kind og multilevel thing is usually achieved through iso_level3 + iso_level5, not iso_level3 + backspace Using level5(rctrl_switch) to handle more spaces is quite disturbing because RALT is not working as expected (and I guess many people don't use those spaces so much). Wouldn't it be better to have an oss variant layout with standard RALT (and/or find another place for those spaces) ? (In reply to comment #4) > Using level5(rctrl_switch) to handle more spaces is quite disturbing because > RALT is not working as expected I'll probably change the defintion to use RALT instead of level5 to work around the problem (as discussed in bug #9529). That is, when I'm back from vacations :) > the problem (as discussed in bug #9529). That is, when I'm back from vacations
> :)
Are you finally back, Nicolas?;)
I hope we already have enough xkb options for various types of space character. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.