Summary: | RFE: systemd should be able to do minimal MD disassembly on shutdown | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | systemd | Reporter: | Anonymous Helper <anonymous> |
Component: | general | Assignee: | systemd-bugs |
Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | systemd-bugs |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
Anonymous Helper
2012-06-18 23:12:53 UTC
Systemd does not support "fake block devices". This needs to be provided by the raid tools themselves and hook up into systemd. Most of the things are done today by (mostly weird) shell scrips provided by the distributions. Systemd has currently no plans to support MD or LVM natively. We provide minimal dis-assembly support for device-mapper volumes, something similar could probably be done for MD, but someone needs to do it, and it would need to be reasonable simple and not involve running daemons, calling-out to command line tools or linking against uncommon libraries. None of the main systemd developers I know uses any MD or LVM, so I have no idea who we could expect to do that. During shutdown systemd (actually the shutdown binary) will attempt to destroy DM devices and loop devices, and unmount filesystems. So I'd think it should deal with this setup. Is this still a problem? (In reply to comment #2) > During shutdown systemd (actually the shutdown binary) will attempt to > destroy DM devices and loop devices, and unmount filesystems. So I'd think > it should deal with this setup. Is this still a problem? Well, MD is not DM. And given that we detach all that stuff, I'd be open to adding a patch that does what we do for DM also for MD... |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.