Summary: | Precision problems in fb/fbcompose.c and fb/fbpict.h | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | xorg | Reporter: | Billy Biggs <billy.biggs> |
Component: | Server/General | Assignee: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | high | CC: | eric, keithp |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 (IA32) | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 6666 |
Description
Billy Biggs
2005-08-02 05:22:12 UTC
Created attachment 3206 [details]
SVGscan log with details of the 130 xlink:href links in question
Created attachment 3323 [details] [review] cairo-ft-oblique.patch Here is a patch I committed today to xserver/fb which fixes a rounding bug. Similar to the other patch on this bug, this fixes an error in the math which is causing incorrect output. Created attachment 3324 [details] [review] Patch to make xorg-server build on alpha Here is yet another patch which fixes some incorrect output from the fb code. These can be split up into multiple bugs if necessary, but it's yet another change in the same theme -- a precision error in the current fb code in xorg which causes wrong pixels. Marking as blocking for the release, I'll resurrect my patches. ping. any word on these patches? Sorry, i'll get on it asap. So far we've had problems reproducing the issues with the Xorg server even though I know it has these problems. I just don't want to commit the code blind. reping. what's the status on this? unclear that this fixes anything appreciable, so deferring this to 7.1 enough precision bugs have been fixed in fb since pre-7 that i'm calling this one fixed. if there are others please open new bugs. reopening at anholt's suggestion; but unless a patch is forthcoming this isn't going to block 7.1. (In reply to comment #12) > reopening at anholt's suggestion; but unless a patch is forthcoming this isn't > going to block 7.1. patch is not forthcoming; moving out to 7.2. I'm a bit confused. Is the original patch submitted into xorg and all is fine or has additional precision problems been discovered that needs to be addressed? Yes, confirmed that the patch here was committed to xorg (8bfffb96b552a3facb77ff9e81658e80becbf2f4 is the commit, compare to a029f3463684b5d1a0470a86da2d1d9157e1b9f4 in ~anholt/xserver). |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.