Bug 17946

Summary:

patches to avoid gcc warnings for libX11

Product:

xorg

Reporter:

Peter Breitenlohner <peb>

Component:

Lib/Xlib

Assignee:

Xorg Project Team <xorg-team>

Status:

RESOLVED FIXED

QA Contact:

Xorg Project Team <xorg-team>

Severity:

normal

Priority:

medium

Keywords:

janitor, patch

Version:

7.3 (2007.09)

Hardware:

Other

OS:

All

Whiteboard:

i915 platform:

i915 features:

Attachments:

Description	Flags
patch to avoid gcc warning for libX11 (V 1.1.5): redefined	none
patch to avoid gcc warning for libX11 (V 1.1.5): missing newline	none
patch to avoid gcc warning for libX11 (V 1.1.5): discards qualifiers	none
patch to avoid gcc warning for libX11 (V 1.1.5): discards qualifiers	none
patch to avoid gcc warning for libX11 (V 1.1.5): incompatible pointer type	none

Description Peter Breitenlohner 2008-10-07 08:27:12 UTC

Created attachment 19439 [details] [review]
patch to avoid gcc warning for libX11 (V 1.1.5): redefined

Attached are five small patches to avoid various gcc warnings for libX11 (V 1.1.5), each patch starting with a short comment

Some of the warnings actually point to the problem that two of the manpages are incomplete (probably truncated).

Comment 1 Peter Breitenlohner 2008-10-07 08:29:27 UTC

Created attachment 19440 [details] [review]
patch to avoid gcc warning for libX11 (V 1.1.5): missing newline

Two of these warnings are actually due to truncated (or otherwise incomplete) manpages

Comment 2 Peter Breitenlohner 2008-10-07 08:31:11 UTC

Created attachment 19441 [details] [review]
patch to avoid gcc warning for libX11 (V 1.1.5): discards qualifiers

Comment 3 Peter Breitenlohner 2008-10-07 08:31:42 UTC

Created attachment 19442 [details] [review]
patch to avoid gcc warning for libX11 (V 1.1.5): discards qualifiers

Comment 4 Peter Breitenlohner 2008-10-07 08:32:32 UTC

Created attachment 19443 [details] [review]
patch to avoid gcc warning for libX11 (V 1.1.5): incompatible pointer type

Comment 5 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade 2009-01-29 15:00:35 UTC

Thanks for the patches.

Corrections just pushed to git master.

Attachment #19442 [details] was already applied (by me) on
another batch of bug fixes.

About the question in attachment #19443 [details] [review] (I am no
expert :-) but type Xim has the private field
(named "private" of type XIMPrivateRec, while XIM
doesn't.

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.