Summary: | Text console permanent corruption when killing Xserver. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | xorg | Reporter: | Raúl <rasasi78> |
Component: | Driver/intel | Assignee: | Gordon Jin <gordon.jin> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Xorg Project Team <xorg-team> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | CC: | brice.goglin, jello, rasasi78 |
Version: | 7.3 (2007.09) | ||
Hardware: | x86-64 (AMD64) | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: |
Description
Raúl
2007-12-20 15:30:52 UTC
Is this dup with 13196? You're using the intelfb or vesafb framebuffer driver? At this point, that's an unsupported configuration (and probably never will be supported) so we'll probably have to mark this WONTFIX. Indeed I'm using framebuffer, I'm almost sure that it's vesafb. So if you say that this combination is not supported it is ok, but where should I know what configuration is it supported in order to have framebuffer console and Xorg running and why the mentioned combination it it not supported? Thanks. I don't think we currently document the fact that the Intel X driver and fb drivers are incompatible (though I've mentioned it on irc and the mailing lists iirc). We should probably fix that by adding a note to the man page and website... If you really want to use the fb drivers for some reason (say an embedded application) you can use Xfbdev or other fb applications instead of the accelerated intel driver. That should work ok. Jesse Reassigning to Gordon so we can add a note on the website about not using any fb drivers. added in intellinuxgraphics.org website. mark this as wontfix. |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.