Summary: | Windows compatible caps lock behaviour missing | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | xkeyboard-config | Reporter: | Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian> |
Component: | General | Assignee: | xkb |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | Linux (All) | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
i915 platform: | i915 features: | ||
Bug Depends on: | 9546 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Christian Casteyde
2007-08-01 03:03:23 UTC
Would #9546 help your problem? The description given in 9546 seems to be the same as my problem. It may be wise to seperate the shift unlocking behaviour from the caps behaviour, since each key should have its own rules. Moreover, this model is more powerfull, because this enable the use of all the caps option independently from the shift unlocking behaviour. That is, we can keep the local keyboard rules unchanged. (Linux mapping is by far already better than Windows one for the French layout for example, because the CAPS lock leaves special letters such as capitalized e acute avalaible, and there is no way except Alt+0201 under Windows to get them for example. So uppercasing keys abouve alphabetic could be annoying (that would give numbers, already available in the numpad), even if totally compatible with Windows...) However, i didn't manage to use the attachment (where should I put it to use this option?) and couldn't test it to see if it is usable for ex-Windows users (the test should be done by my father, not me actually, to be completly sure, me being behind him and hearing him grumbling - or not). I couldn't test either if the Shift keypress unlocks first and is not consumed. ok, I'll first resolve 9546 and you'll see whether it would be good enough for you or not... Using shift:breaks_caps should work ok for you now |
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.