Bug 1161

that's true that it should have a greater priority that postscript itself as
.pfa files are valid postscript files

----

i see nowhere in this XML bloc that application/x-font-type1 is a subclass of
application/postscript
    <sub-class-of type="application/postscript"/>

like application/postscript should be a subclass of text/plain
    <sub-class-of type="text/plain"/>
----

the only other thing i don't really like in the x-font-type1 XML is that :
    <glob pattern="*.pcf.Z"/>
(the .Z part aspecialy)

if we start to add .Z, .bz2, .gz to every mime-type/file extension, it is a no-go

well, that was my 2cts

---

Thanks, fixed subclassing.

> the only other thing i don't really like in the x-font-type1 XML is that :
>     <glob pattern="*.pcf.Z"/>
> (the .Z part aspecialy)
> if we start to add .Z, .bz2, .gz to every mime-type/file extension, it is a no-go

I think we're driving towards adding foo-compressed MIME type definitions as we
need them. This does mostly affect font files, READusualMEs, ps.gz etc.., i.e.
files that have a chance of being handled differently by the respective handling
applications compared to "common" gzip files (.doc.gz).