Bug 108344

Summary:	[icl rps][CI][DRMTIP] igt@pm_rps@(reset\|waitboost) - fail - Failed assertion: pre_freqs[CUR] < pre_freqs[MAX]
Product:	DRI	Reporter:	Martin Peres <martin.peres>
Component:	DRM/Intel	Assignee:	Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Intel GFX Bugs mailing list <intel-gfx-bugs>
Severity:	normal
Priority:	high	CC:	intel-gfx-bugs
Version:	XOrg git
Hardware:	Other
OS:	All
Whiteboard:	ReadyForDev
i915 platform:	ICL	i915 features:	power/Other

Description Martin Peres 2018-10-12 14:36:31 UTC

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_125/fi-icl-u2/igt@pm_rps@waitboost.html

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_125/fi-icl-u2/igt@pm_rps@reset.html

Starting subtest: reset
(pm_rps:2236) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function waitboost, file ../tests/pm_rps.c:606:
(pm_rps:2236) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: pre_freqs[CUR] < pre_freqs[MAX]
(pm_rps:2236) CRITICAL: error: 600 >= 600
Subtest reset failed.

Comment 1 Lakshmi 2018-11-30 13:08:45 UTC

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5219/shard-iclb4/igt@pm_rps@waitboost.html

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_5218/shard-iclb4/igt@pm_rps@reset.html

Setting the priority to High as it happens to occur in SHARDS.

Comment 2 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-03-13 10:32:04 UTC

This looks like it may be resolved, as it hasn't occurred in CI for 10 days. I will mark it resolved, let's reopen it if it occurs again.

Comment 3 Chris Wilson 2019-03-13 10:35:45 UTC

RPS on icl is still non-functional.

Comment 4 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-03-13 10:37:30 UTC

I thought there was another bug for that? But OK

Comment 5 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-03-13 10:41:33 UTC

Is this a duplicate of Bug 102250?

Comment 6 Chris Wilson 2019-03-13 11:55:15 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 108059 ***

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.