Attachment 57329 Details for Bug 43744 – [4 v3] Use actual recursive pthreads mutexes, rather than NIH'ing them, wrong

[patch] [4 v3] Use actual recursive pthreads mutexes, rather than NIH'ing them, wrong

0004-Use-actual-recursive-pthreads-mutexes-rather-than-NI.patch (text/plain), 8.47 KB, created by Simon McVittie on 2012-02-20 08:10:52 UTC

(hide)

Description:

Filename:

MIME Type:

Creator: Simon McVittie

Created: 2012-02-20 08:10:52 UTC

Size: 8.47 KB

patch

obsolete

>From f4423b3382dec90d4fe1abee445b495b7e8842a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@collabora.co.uk>
>Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:02:20 +0000
>Subject: [PATCH 4/7] Use actual recursive pthreads mutexes, rather than
> NIH'ing them, wrong
>
>Very loosely based on a patch from Sigmund Augdal.
>
>For the moment, we make PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE a hard requirement:
>it's required by POSIX 2008 Base and SUSv2.
>
>If your (non-Windows) platform doesn't have PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE,
>please report a bug on freedesktop.org bugzilla with details of the
>platform in question.
>
>Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
>Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <simon.mcvittie@collabora.co.uk>
>---
> dbus/dbus-sysdeps-pthread.c |  149 ++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-pthread.c b/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-pthread.c
>index 7073751..062b53e 100644
>--- a/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-pthread.c
>+++ b/dbus/dbus-sysdeps-pthread.c
>@@ -44,12 +44,7 @@
> static dbus_bool_t have_monotonic_clock = 0;
> 
> typedef struct {
>-  pthread_mutex_t lock; /**< lock protecting count field */
>-  volatile int count;   /**< count of how many times lock holder has recursively locked */
>-  volatile pthread_t holder; /**< holder of the lock if count >0,
>-                                valid but arbitrary thread if count
>-                                has ever been >0, uninitialized memory
>-                                if count has never been >0 */
>+  pthread_mutex_t lock; /**< the lock */
> } DBusMutexPThread;
> 
> typedef struct {
>@@ -77,12 +72,12 @@ typedef struct {
> } while (0)
> #endif /* !DBUS_DISABLE_ASSERT */
> 
>-static DBusMutex*
>-_dbus_pthread_mutex_new (void)
>+static DBusMutex *
>+_dbus_pthread_cmutex_new (void)
> {
>   DBusMutexPThread *pmutex;
>   int result;
>-  
>+
>   pmutex = dbus_new (DBusMutexPThread, 1);
>   if (pmutex == NULL)
>     return NULL;
>@@ -99,14 +94,35 @@ _dbus_pthread_mutex_new (void)
>       PTHREAD_CHECK ("pthread_mutex_init", result);
>     }
> 
>-  /* Only written */
>-  pmutex->count = 0;
>+  return DBUS_MUTEX (pmutex);
>+}
>+
>+static DBusMutex *
>+_dbus_pthread_rmutex_new (void)
>+{
>+  DBusMutexPThread *pmutex;
>+  pthread_mutexattr_t mutexattr;
>+  int result;
>+
>+  pmutex = dbus_new (DBusMutexPThread, 1);
>+  if (pmutex == NULL)
>+    return NULL;
>+
>+  pthread_mutexattr_init (&mutexattr);
>+  pthread_mutexattr_settype (&mutexattr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE);
>+  result = pthread_mutex_init (&pmutex->lock, &mutexattr);
>+  pthread_mutexattr_destroy (&mutexattr);
>+
>+  if (result == ENOMEM || result == EAGAIN)
>+    {
>+      dbus_free (pmutex);
>+      return NULL;
>+    }
>+  else
>+    {
>+      PTHREAD_CHECK ("pthread_mutex_init", result);
>+    }
> 
>-  /* There's no portable way to have a "null" pthread afaik so we
>-   * can't set pmutex->holder to anything sensible.  We only access it
>-   * once the lock is held (which means we've set it).
>-   */
>-  
>   return DBUS_MUTEX (pmutex);
> }
> 
>@@ -115,79 +131,26 @@ _dbus_pthread_mutex_free (DBusMutex *mutex)
> {
>   DBusMutexPThread *pmutex = DBUS_MUTEX_PTHREAD (mutex);
> 
>-  _dbus_assert (pmutex->count == 0);
>-  
>   PTHREAD_CHECK ("pthread_mutex_destroy", pthread_mutex_destroy (&pmutex->lock));
>-
>   dbus_free (pmutex);
> }
> 
>-static void
>+static dbus_bool_t
> _dbus_pthread_mutex_lock (DBusMutex *mutex)
> {
>   DBusMutexPThread *pmutex = DBUS_MUTEX_PTHREAD (mutex);
>-  pthread_t self = pthread_self ();
>-
>-  /* If the count is > 0 then someone had the lock, maybe us. If it is
>-   * 0, then it might immediately change right after we read it,
>-   * but it will be changed by another thread; i.e. if we read 0,
>-   * we assume that this thread doesn't have the lock.
>-   *
>-   * Not 100% sure this is safe, but ... seems like it should be.
>-   */
>-  if (pmutex->count == 0)
>-    {
>-      /* We know we don't have the lock; someone may have the lock. */
>-      
>-      PTHREAD_CHECK ("pthread_mutex_lock", pthread_mutex_lock (&pmutex->lock));
>-
>-      /* We now have the lock. Count must be 0 since it must be 0 when
>-       * the lock is released by another thread, and we just now got
>-       * the lock.
>-       */
>-      _dbus_assert (pmutex->count == 0);
>-      
>-      pmutex->holder = self;
>-      pmutex->count = 1;
>-    }
>-  else
>-    {
>-      /* We know someone had the lock, possibly us. Thus
>-       * pmutex->holder is not pointing to junk, though it may not be
>-       * the lock holder anymore if the lock holder is not us.  If the
>-       * lock holder is us, then we definitely have the lock.
>-       */
>-
>-      if (pthread_equal (pmutex->holder, self))
>-        {
>-          /* We already have the lock. */
>-          _dbus_assert (pmutex->count > 0);
>-        }
>-      else
>-        {
>-          /* Wait for the lock */
>-          PTHREAD_CHECK ("pthread_mutex_lock", pthread_mutex_lock (&pmutex->lock));
>-	  pmutex->holder = self;
>-          _dbus_assert (pmutex->count == 0);
>-        }
>-
>-      pmutex->count += 1;
>-    }
>+
>+  PTHREAD_CHECK ("pthread_mutex_lock", pthread_mutex_lock (&pmutex->lock));
>+  return TRUE;
> }
> 
>-static void
>+static dbus_bool_t
> _dbus_pthread_mutex_unlock (DBusMutex *mutex)
> {
>   DBusMutexPThread *pmutex = DBUS_MUTEX_PTHREAD (mutex);
> 
>-  _dbus_assert (pmutex->count > 0);
>-  
>-  pmutex->count -= 1;
>-
>-  if (pmutex->count == 0)
>-    PTHREAD_CHECK ("pthread_mutex_unlock", pthread_mutex_unlock (&pmutex->lock));
>-  
>-  /* We leave pmutex->holder set to ourselves, its content is undefined if count is 0 */
>+  PTHREAD_CHECK ("pthread_mutex_unlock", pthread_mutex_unlock (&pmutex->lock));
>+  return TRUE;
> }
> 
> static DBusCondVar *
>@@ -239,17 +202,8 @@ _dbus_pthread_condvar_wait (DBusCondVar *cond,
> {
>   DBusMutexPThread *pmutex = DBUS_MUTEX_PTHREAD (mutex);
>   DBusCondVarPThread *pcond = DBUS_COND_VAR_PTHREAD (cond);
>-  int old_count;
>-  
>-  _dbus_assert (pmutex->count > 0);
>-  _dbus_assert (pthread_equal (pmutex->holder, pthread_self ()));
> 
>-  old_count = pmutex->count;
>-  pmutex->count = 0;		/* allow other threads to lock */
>   PTHREAD_CHECK ("pthread_cond_wait", pthread_cond_wait (&pcond->cond, &pmutex->lock));
>-  _dbus_assert (pmutex->count == 0);
>-  pmutex->count = old_count;
>-  pmutex->holder = pthread_self(); /* other threads may have locked the mutex in the meantime */
> }
> 
> static dbus_bool_t
>@@ -262,10 +216,6 @@ _dbus_pthread_condvar_wait_timeout (DBusCondVar               *cond,
>   struct timeval time_now;
>   struct timespec end_time;
>   int result;
>-  int old_count;
>-  
>-  _dbus_assert (pmutex->count > 0);
>-  _dbus_assert (pthread_equal (pmutex->holder, pthread_self ()));  
> 
> #ifdef HAVE_MONOTONIC_CLOCK
>   if (have_monotonic_clock)
>@@ -288,8 +238,6 @@ _dbus_pthread_condvar_wait_timeout (DBusCondVar               *cond,
>       end_time.tv_nsec -= 1000*1000*1000;
>     }
> 
>-  old_count = pmutex->count;
>-  pmutex->count = 0;
>   result = pthread_cond_timedwait (&pcond->cond, &pmutex->lock, &end_time);
>   
>   if (result != ETIMEDOUT)
>@@ -297,10 +245,6 @@ _dbus_pthread_condvar_wait_timeout (DBusCondVar               *cond,
>       PTHREAD_CHECK ("pthread_cond_timedwait", result);
>     }
> 
>-  _dbus_assert (pmutex->count == 0);
>-  pmutex->count = old_count;
>-  pmutex->holder = pthread_self(); /* other threads may have locked the mutex in the meantime */
>-  
>   /* return true if we did not time out */
>   return result != ETIMEDOUT;
> }
>@@ -323,6 +267,10 @@ _dbus_pthread_condvar_wake_all (DBusCondVar *cond)
> 
> static const DBusThreadFunctions pthread_functions =
> {
>+  DBUS_THREAD_FUNCTIONS_MUTEX_NEW_MASK |
>+  DBUS_THREAD_FUNCTIONS_MUTEX_FREE_MASK |
>+  DBUS_THREAD_FUNCTIONS_MUTEX_LOCK_MASK |
>+  DBUS_THREAD_FUNCTIONS_MUTEX_UNLOCK_MASK |
>   DBUS_THREAD_FUNCTIONS_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_NEW_MASK |
>   DBUS_THREAD_FUNCTIONS_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_FREE_MASK |
>   DBUS_THREAD_FUNCTIONS_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_LOCK_MASK |
>@@ -333,17 +281,20 @@ static const DBusThreadFunctions pthread_functions =
>   DBUS_THREAD_FUNCTIONS_CONDVAR_WAIT_TIMEOUT_MASK |
>   DBUS_THREAD_FUNCTIONS_CONDVAR_WAKE_ONE_MASK|
>   DBUS_THREAD_FUNCTIONS_CONDVAR_WAKE_ALL_MASK,
>-  NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>+  _dbus_pthread_cmutex_new,
>+  _dbus_pthread_mutex_free,
>+  _dbus_pthread_mutex_lock,
>+  _dbus_pthread_mutex_unlock,
>   _dbus_pthread_condvar_new,
>   _dbus_pthread_condvar_free,
>   _dbus_pthread_condvar_wait,
>   _dbus_pthread_condvar_wait_timeout,
>   _dbus_pthread_condvar_wake_one,
>   _dbus_pthread_condvar_wake_all,
>-  _dbus_pthread_mutex_new,
>+  _dbus_pthread_rmutex_new,
>   _dbus_pthread_mutex_free,
>-  _dbus_pthread_mutex_lock,
>-  _dbus_pthread_mutex_unlock
>+  (void (*) (DBusMutex *)) _dbus_pthread_mutex_lock,
>+  (void (*) (DBusMutex *)) _dbus_pthread_mutex_unlock
> };
> 
> static void
>-- 
>1.7.9
>

Actions: View | Splinter Review

Attachments on bug 43744: 54357 | 57049 | 57050 | 57051 | 57052 | 57078 | 57079 | 57166 | 57212 | 57326 | 57327 | 57328 | 57329 | 57330 | 57331 | 57332 | 57761 | 57762

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.